Classes of barren extensions
Natasha Dobrinen, Daniel Hathaway

TL;DR
This paper explores how various classes of non-Ramsey ultrafilters and certain Boolean algebras, when used as forcing notions, produce barren extensions that preserve many properties of the original model, extending previous results beyond Ramsey ultrafilters.
Contribution
It demonstrates that several classes of non-Ramsey ultrafilters and specific Boolean algebras also generate barren extensions, broadening the scope of models with preserved properties.
Findings
Non-Ramsey ultrafilters produce barren extensions similar to Ramsey ultrafilters.
Various classes of ultrafilters, including p-points and rapid ultrafilters, generate models with preserved properties.
Boolean algebras like in^{\u03b1} also produce barren extensions.
Abstract
Henle, Mathias, and Woodin proved that, provided that holds in a model of ZF, then forcing with over adds no new sets of ordinals, thus earning the name a "barren" extension. Moreover, under an additional assumption, they proved that this generic extension preserves all strong partition cardinals. This forcing thus produces a model , where is a Ramsey ultrafilter, with many properties of the original model . This begged the question of how important the Ramseyness of is for these results. In this paper, we show that several classes of -closed forcings which generate non-Ramsey ultrafilters have the same properties. Such ultrafilters include Milliken-Taylor ultrafilters, a class of rapid p-points of Laflamme, -arrow p-points of Baumgartner and Taylor,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
