When is chemical disequilibrium in Earth-like planetary atmospheres a biosignature versus an anti-biosignature? Disequilibria from dead to living worlds
Nicholas Wogan, David Catling

TL;DR
This paper investigates how chemical disequilibrium in exoplanet atmospheres can indicate life or its absence, showing that certain disequilibria are anti-biosignatures while others signal biological activity, depending on context.
Contribution
It introduces a model comparing disequilibrium on lifeless and biosphere-bearing Earth-like planets, clarifying when disequilibrium indicates life or death.
Findings
Prebiotic Earth likely had large disequilibrium due to water and volcanic gases.
Chemotrophic life reduced disequilibrium by consuming reactive species.
Modern Earth's disequilibrium includes biogenic gases like O2, indicating life.
Abstract
Chemical disequilibrium in exoplanetary atmospheres (detectable with remote spectroscopy) can indicate life. The modern Earth's atmosphere-ocean system has a much larger chemical disequilibrium than other solar system planets with atmospheres because of oxygenic photosynthesis. However, no analysis exists comparing disequilibrium on lifeless, prebiotic planets to disequilibrium on worlds with primitive chemotrophic biospheres that live off chemicals and not light. Here, we use a photochemical-microbial ecosystem model to calculate the atmosphere-ocean disequilibria of Earth with no life and with a chemotrophic biosphere. We show that the prebiotic Earth likely had a relatively large atmosphere-ocean disequilibrium due to the coexistence of water and volcanic H2, CO2, and CO. Subsequent chemotrophic life probably destroyed nearly all of the prebiotic disequilibrium through its…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
