Comparison of counterstreaming suprathermal electron signatures of ICMEs with and without magnetic cloud: are all ICMEs flux ropes?
Jiemin Wang, Yan Zhao, Hengqiang Feng, Qiang Liu, Zhanjun Tian, Hongbo, Li, Ake Zhao, Guoqing Zhao

TL;DR
This study compares counterstreaming suprathermal electron signatures in ICMEs with and without magnetic clouds to investigate whether all ICMEs are flux ropes, revealing that many non-MC ICMEs lack flux rope structures.
Contribution
It provides evidence that a significant portion of non-MC ICMEs may inherently lack magnetic flux rope structures, challenging the assumption that all ICMEs are flux ropes.
Findings
Only 9.9% of MCs lack CSEs, while 43.9% of non-MCs lack CSEs.
Some non-MC ICMEs with high CSE percentages show stable magnetic fields, indicating flux rope flank crossings.
Most non-MC ICMEs have disordered magnetic fields, suggesting they may not be flux ropes.
Abstract
Magnetic clouds (MCs), as large-scale interplanetary magnetic flux ropes, are usually still connected to the sun at both ends near 1 AU. Many researchers believe that all non-MC interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) also have magnetic flux rope structures, which are inconspicuous because the observing spacecraft crosses the flanks of the rope structures. If so, the field lines of non-MC ICMEs should also be usually connected to the Sun on both ends. Then we want to know whether the field lines of most non-MC ICMEs are still connected to the sun at both ends or not. This study examined the counterstreaming suprathermal electron (CSE) signatures of 266 ICMEs observed by the \emph{Advanced Composition Explorer} (\emph{ACE}) spacecraft from 1998 to 2008 and compared the CSE signatures of MCs and non-MC ICMEs. Results show that only 10 of the 101 MC events ( ) and 75 of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
