Operator thermalization vs eigenstate thermalization
Aleksandar Bukva, Philippe Sabella-Garnier, Koenraad Schalm

TL;DR
This paper investigates how operators in integrable quantum systems transition from non-thermalizing to thermalizing behavior as non-integrable perturbations are introduced, revealing detailed operator dynamics and fluctuations.
Contribution
It demonstrates the contrasting behaviors of thermalizing and non-thermalizing operators under non-integrable deformations in the transverse field Ising model, highlighting fluctuation suppression and relaxation times.
Findings
σ^z operator thermalizes with suppressed fluctuations in integrable regime
Fluctuation suppression diminishes as the system becomes non-integrable
A non-thermalizing operator approaches ETH form with increasing non-integrability
Abstract
We study the characteristics of thermalizing and non-thermalizing operators in integrable theories as we turn on a non-integrable deformation. Specifically, we show that , an operator that thermalizes in the integrable transverse field Ising model, has mean matrix elements that resemble ETH, but with fluctuations around the mean that are sharply suppressed. This suppression rapidly dwindles as the Ising model becomes non-integrable by the turning on of a longitudinal field. We also construct a non-thermalizing operator in the integrable regime, which slowly approaches the ETH form as the theory becomes non-integrable. At intermediate values of the non-integrable deformation, one distinguishes a perturbatively long relaxation time for this operator.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum many-body systems · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models · Theoretical and Computational Physics
