
TL;DR
This paper explores how learning multiple related tasks can help automatically acquire domain-specific biases, providing theoretical bounds and experimental evidence for improved generalization with multi-task learning.
Contribution
It introduces a theorem bounding the number of tasks needed to learn domain bias and shows how multi-task learning reduces sample complexity per task.
Findings
Number of tasks needed scales with domain complexity
Multi-task learning reduces examples needed per task
Experimental results support theoretical bounds
Abstract
In this paper the problem of {\em learning} appropriate domain-specific bias is addressed. It is shown that this can be achieved by learning many related tasks from the same domain, and a theorem is given bounding the number tasks that must be learnt. A corollary of the theorem is that if the tasks are known to possess a common {\em internal representation} or {\em preprocessing} then the number of examples required per task for good generalisation when learning tasks simultaneously scales like , where is a bound on the minimum number of examples required to learn a single task, and is a bound on the number of examples required to learn each task independently. An experiment providing strong qualitative support for the theoretical results is reported.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Algorithms · Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning · Machine Learning and Data Classification
