Improved limits on Fierz Interference using asymmetry measurements from the UCNA experiment
Xuan Sun, E. Adamek, B. Allgeier, Y. Bagdasarova, D. B. Berguno, M., Blatnik, T. J. Bowles, L. J. Broussard, M. A.-P. Brown, R. Carr, S. Clayton,, C. Cude-Woods, S. Currie, E. B. Dees, X. Ding, B. W. Filippone, A. Garc\'ia,, P. Geltenbort, S. Hasan, K. P. Hickerson, J. Hoagland

TL;DR
This paper reports improved experimental limits on the Fierz interference term in neutron beta decay by analyzing asymmetry data from the UCNA experiment, enhancing constraints on possible new physics beyond the Standard Model.
Contribution
The study provides the first combined analysis of multiple UCNA datasets to set tighter limits on the Fierz interference term in neutron decay.
Findings
Measured $b_{n} = 0.066 \, extpm \, 0.041_{\text{stat}} \, \pm \, 0.024_{\text{syst}}$
Established a 90% confidence interval for $b_{n}$ as $-0.012$ to $0.144$
Improved constraints on physics beyond the Standard Model in neutron decay
Abstract
The Ultracold Neutron Asymmetry (UCNA) experiment was designed to measure the -decay asymmetry parameter, , for free neutron decay. In the experiment, polarized ultracold neutrons are transported into a decay trap, and their -decay electrons are detected with acceptance into two detector packages which provide position and energy reconstruction. The experiment also has sensitivity to , the Fierz interference term in the neutron -decay rate. In this work, we determine from the energy dependence of using the data taken during the UCNA 2011-2013 run. In addition, we present the same type of analysis using the earlier 2010 dataset. Motivated by improved statistics and comparable systematic errors compared to the 2010 data-taking run, we present a new measurement using the weighted average of our asymmetry dataset…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
