How do scientific disciplines evolve in applied sciences? The properties of scientific fission and ambidextrous scientific drivers
Mario Coccia

TL;DR
This paper investigates how scientific disciplines, especially in applied physics, evolve through processes like fission and driven by technological and discovery-based factors, revealing typical durations and dynamics.
Contribution
It introduces the concepts of scientific fission and ambidextrous drivers, providing empirical insights into the evolution of experimental physics and applied sciences.
Findings
Scientific fission leads to autonomous research fields.
Evolution driven by scientific discoveries and new technologies.
Average duration of scientific upwaves is about 80 years.
Abstract
One of the fundamental questions in science is how scientific disciplines evolve and sustain progress in society. No studies to date allows us to explain the endogenous processes that support the evolution of scientific disciplines and emergence of new scientific fields in applied sciences of physics. This study confronts this problem here by investigating the evolution of experimental physics to explain and generalize some characteristics of the dynamics of applied sciences. Empirical analysis suggests properties about the evolution of experimental physics and in general of applied sciences, such as: a) scientific fission, the evolution of scientific disciplines generates a process of division into two or more research fields that evolve as autonomous entities over time; b) ambidextrous drivers of science, the evolution of science via scientific fission is due to scientific discoveries…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
