Cloud Properties and Correlations with Star Formation in Numerical Simulations of the Three-Phase ISM
S. Alwin Mao, Eve C. Ostriker, and Chang-Goo Kim

TL;DR
This study compares gravity-based and density-based methods to identify clouds in simulations of the three-phase ISM, analyzing their properties, boundedness, and correlation with star formation rates over time.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed comparison of cloud identification methods and their relation to star formation, revealing limitations of traditional virial parameters and the importance of density thresholds.
Findings
Bound clouds have masses ~10^3-10^4 M_solar and densities ~100 cm^-3.
High-mass clouds can be unbound despite low virial parameters.
Star formation efficiency per free-fall time is about 0.4, increasing with density.
Abstract
We apply gravity-based and density-based methods to identify clouds in numerical simulations of the star-forming, three-phase interstellar medium (ISM), and compare their properties and their global correlation with the star formation rate over time. The gravity-based method identifies bound objects, which have masses M ~ 10^3 - 10^4 M_solar at densities n_H ~ 100 cm^-3, and traditional virial parameters alpha_v ~ 0.5 - 5. For clouds defined by a density threshold n_H,min , the average virial parameter decreases, and the fraction of material that is genuinely bound increases, at higher n_H,min. Surprisingly, these clouds can be unbound even when alpha_v < 2, and high mass clouds (10^4 - 10^6 M_solar) are generally unbound. This suggests that the traditional alpha_v is at best an approximate measure of boundedness in the ISM. All clouds have internal turbulent motions increasing with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
