Clustering of Local Group distances: publication bias or correlated measurements? VI. Extending to Virgo cluster distances
Richard de Grijs, Giuseppe Bono

TL;DR
This paper compiles and analyzes a comprehensive set of Virgo cluster distance measurements to extend the Local Group distance framework, providing updated distance estimates and implications for black hole mass calculations.
Contribution
It introduces an extensive, updated database of Virgo cluster distances and recommends a new distance modulus based on recent measurements, extending the Local Group distance framework.
Findings
Recommended distance modulus for M87: 31.03 ± 0.14 mag
Updated black hole mass estimate: (5.9 ± 0.6) × 10^9 M_d7
Distance measurements are consistent across primary and secondary indicators
Abstract
We have established an internally consistent Local Group distance framework, using the Galactic Center, the Large Magellanic Cloud, and Messier 31 (M31) as important stepping stones. At greater distances, few distance benchmarks are available. As a consequence, M87 and/or Virgo cluster distances are often invoked as the next rung on the ladder to more distant objects such as the Fornax and Coma clusters. Therefore, we extensively mined the published literature for independently derived distance estimates to either M87 or the center of the Virgo cluster. Based on our newly compiled, comprehensive database of 213 such distances, published between 1929 and 2017 July, we recommend an outward extension to our distance framework, mag ( Mpc; where the uncertainty represents the Gaussian of the distribution), based on a subset of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
