Pentagon representations and complex projective structures on closed surfaces
Thomas Le Fils

TL;DR
This paper introduces pentagon representations of surface groups into PSL(2,C), characterizes those without Schottky decompositions, and corrects a gap in the proof that all non-elementary representations are holonomies of complex projective structures.
Contribution
It defines pentagon representations, characterizes non-Schottky representations, and repairs a gap in the proof relating surface group representations to complex projective structures.
Findings
Pentagon representations are exactly the non-elementary, non-Schottky surface group representations.
Pentagon representations can be realized as holonomies of complex projective structures.
The proof that all non-elementary representations are holonomies is corrected and completed.
Abstract
We define a class of representations of the fundamental group of a closed surface of genus to : the pentagon representations. We show that they are exactly the non-elementary -representations of surface groups that do not admit a Schottky decomposition, i.e. a pants decomposition such that the restriction of the representation to each pair of pants is an isomorphism onto a Schottky group. In doing so, we exhibit a gap in the proof of Gallo, Kapovich and Marden that every non-elementary representation of a surface group to is the holonomy of a projective structure, possibly with one branched point of order . We show that pentagon representations arise as such holonomies and repair their proof.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematics and Applications · Advanced Topics in Algebra · Algebraic and Geometric Analysis
