Explaining Away Results in Accurate and Tolerant Template Matching
M. W. Spratling

TL;DR
This paper introduces an explaining away probabilistic inference method for template matching in computer vision, improving robustness to appearance changes like occlusion and deformation, and demonstrating superior accuracy over existing methods.
Contribution
It applies explaining away inference to template matching, enhancing tolerance to appearance variations and achieving better accuracy than current state-of-the-art techniques.
Findings
Superior accuracy in image patch matching
Enhanced robustness to occlusion and deformation
First application of explaining away in this context
Abstract
Recognising and locating image patches or sets of image features is an important task underlying much work in computer vision. Traditionally this has been accomplished using template matching. However, template matching is notoriously brittle in the face of changes in appearance caused by, for example, variations in viewpoint, partial occlusion, and non-rigid deformations. This article tests a method of template matching that is more tolerant to such changes in appearance and that can, therefore, more accurately identify image patches. In traditional template matching the comparison between a template and the image is independent of the other templates. In contrast, the method advocated here takes into account the evidence provided by the image for the template at each location and the full range of alternative explanations represented by the same template at other locations and by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
