Radio Emission from Interstellar Shocks: Young Type Ia Supernova Remnants and the Case of N 103B in the Large Magellanic Cloud
R. Z. E. Alsaberi, L. A. Barnes, M. D. Filipovic, N. I. Maxted, H., Sano, G. Rowell, L.M. Bozzetto, S. Gurovich, D. Urovsevic, D. Onic, B.Q. For,, P. Manojlovic, G. Wong, T. Galvin, P. Kavanagh, N. Ralph, E.J. Crawford, M., Sasaki, F. Haberl, P. Maggi, N. F. H. Tothil, Y. Fukui

TL;DR
This study presents a detailed radio analysis of the young Type Ia supernova remnant N 103B in the LMC, revealing asymmetrical morphology, spectral features, and magnetic field estimates, contributing to understanding supernova explosion mechanisms.
Contribution
It provides new radio continuum observations and analysis of N 103B, highlighting asymmetrical morphology, spectral properties, and magnetic fields, and compares these features with other young Type Ia SNRs to infer explosion scenarios.
Findings
Radio spectral index of -0.75 consistent with young Type Ia SNRs
Radial polarisation peak observed at 5500 and 9000 MHz
Magnetic field strength estimated at 16.4 microG
Abstract
Here we present a radio continuum study based on new and archival data from the Australia Telescope Compact Array towards N 103B, a young (<=1000 yrs) spectroscopically confirmed type Ia SNR in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) and proposed to have originated from a single degenerate progenitor. The radio morphology of this SNR is asymmetrical with two bright regions towards the north-west and south-west of the central location as defined by radio emission. N 103B identified features include: a radio spectral index of -0.75+-0.01 (consistent with other young type Ia SNRs in the Galaxy); a bulk SNR expansion rate as in X-rays; morphology and polarised electrical field vector measurements where we note radial polarisation peak towards the north-west of the remnant at both 5500 and 9000 MHz. The spectrum is concave-up and the most likely reason is the non-linear diffusive shock…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
