Interaction is necessary for distributed learning with privacy or communication constraints
Yuval Dagan, Vitaly Feldman

TL;DR
This paper proves that in non-interactive local differential privacy, learning large-margin linear separators requires exponentially many samples, highlighting the necessity of interaction for efficient distributed learning under privacy constraints.
Contribution
It establishes an exponential lower bound on sample complexity for non-interactive LDP learning of linear separators, introducing a new technique for distribution pair construction.
Findings
Exponential lower bound on sample complexity for non-interactive LDP learning.
Lower bounds extend to stochastic convex optimization and linear models.
Interaction is essential for efficient distributed learning under privacy constraints.
Abstract
Local differential privacy (LDP) is a model where users send privatized data to an untrusted central server whose goal it to solve some data analysis task. In the non-interactive version of this model the protocol consists of a single round in which a server sends requests to all users then receives their responses. This version is deployed in industry due to its practical advantages and has attracted significant research interest. Our main result is an exponential lower bound on the number of samples necessary to solve the standard task of learning a large-margin linear separator in the non-interactive LDP model. Via a standard reduction this lower bound implies an exponential lower bound for stochastic convex optimization and specifically, for learning linear models with a convex, Lipschitz and smooth loss. These results answer the questions posed in \citep{SmithTU17,DanielyF18}. Our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
