Correspondence of cosmology from non-extensive thermodynamics with fluids of generalized equation of state
Shin'ichi Nojiri, Sergei D. Odintsov, Emmanuel N. Saridakis, R., Myrzakulov

TL;DR
This paper explores the link between non-extensive thermodynamics and generalized fluid equations of state in cosmology, showing how this duality can explain late-time acceleration and early inflation without a cosmological constant.
Contribution
It establishes a correspondence between non-extensive thermodynamics and generalized fluid equations of state, including scale-dependent exponents, providing a microphysical basis for phenomenological models.
Findings
Effective fluids can drive late-time acceleration without a cosmological constant.
Early universe inflation can be explained by an enhanced effective cosmological constant.
The duality offers a microphysical origin for complex fluid equations of state.
Abstract
We show that there is a correspondence between cosmology from non-extensive thermodynamics and cosmology with fluids of redefined and generalized equation of state. We first establish the correspondence in the case of basic non-extensive thermodynamics, and then we proceed by investigating the more consistent case, from the quantum field theoretical point of view, of varying exponent, namely depending on the scale. The obtained duality provides a way of explaining the complicated phenomenological forms of the effective fluid equation-of-state parameters that are being broadly used in the literature, since their microphysical origin may indeed lie in the non-extensive thermodynamics of spacetime. Finally, concerning the cosmological behavior, we show that at late times the effective fluid may drive the universe acceleration even in the absence of an explicit cosmological constant, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
