Evidence of dust grain evolution from extinction mapping in the IC 63 photodissociation region
Dries Van De Putte (1), Karl D. Gordon (2, 1), Julia Roman-Duval, (2), Benjamin F. Williams (3), Maarten Baes (1), Kirill Tchernyshyov (4),, Brandon L. Lawton (2), Heddy Arab (5) ((1) Sterrenkundig Observatorium,, Universiteit Gent, Belgium, (2) Space Telescope Science Institute

TL;DR
This study uses high-resolution multi-wavelength observations and Bayesian analysis to map dust extinction properties in the IC 63 PDR, revealing spatial variations indicative of dust grain evolution.
Contribution
It presents the first panchromatic view of dust in a PDR, combining HST, Spitzer, and Herschel data with Bayesian SED fitting to analyze dust property variations.
Findings
Extinction varies across the PDR, with $A_V$ between 0.5 and 1.4 mag.
The $R_V$ parameter decreases from 3.7 to 2.5, indicating dust evolution.
Spatial variations in dust opacity ratios were observed.
Abstract
Photodissociation regions (PDRs) are parts of the ISM consisting of predominantly neutral gas, located at the interface between H II regions and molecular clouds. The physical conditions within these regions show variations on very short spatial scales, and therefore PDRs constitute ideal laboratories for investigating the properties and evolution of dust grains. We have mapped IC 63 at high resolution from the UV to the NIR (275 nm to 1.6 m), using the Hubble Space Telescope WFC3. Using a Bayesian SED fitting tool, we simultaneously derive a set of stellar (, , distance) and extinction (, ) parameters for 520 background stars. We present maps of and with a resolution of 25 arcsec based on these results. The extinction properties vary across the PDR, with values for between 0.5 and 1.4 mag, and a decreasing trend in , going…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
