TL;DR
This paper derives a physically accurate far-field pathloss model for intelligent reflecting surfaces, clarifying their beamforming capabilities and disproving a previously used pathloss model in the literature.
Contribution
It introduces a new far-field pathloss model based on physical optics and explains the joint beamforming behavior of surface elements, correcting prior misconceptions.
Findings
Derived the far-field pathloss using physical optics techniques.
Showed that surface elements act as diffuse scatterers but can beamform collectively.
Disproved a previously conjectured pathloss model.
Abstract
Intelligent reflecting surfaces can improve the communication between a source and a destination. The surface contains metamaterial that is configured to "reflect" the incident wave from the source towards the destination. Two incompatible pathloss models have been used in prior work. In this letter, we derive the far-field pathloss using physical optics techniques and explain why the surface consists of many elements that individually act as diffuse scatterers but can jointly beamform the signal in a desired direction with a certain beamwidth. We disprove one of the previously conjectured pathloss models.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
