Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: the lensing imprint of cosmic voids on the Cosmic Microwave Background
P. Vielzeuf, A. Kov\'acs, U. Demirbozan, P. Fosalba, E. Baxter, N., Hamaus, D. Huterer, R. Miquel, S. Nadathur, G. Pollina, C. S\'anchez, L., Whiteway, T. M. C. Abbott, S. Allam, J. Annis, S. Avila, D. Brooks, D. L., Burke, A. Carnero Rosell, M. Carrasco Kind, J. Carretero

TL;DR
This study detects the lensing imprint of cosmic voids on the CMB using DES Year 1 data and simulations, confirming the consistency of observed signals with theoretical expectations and refuting previous excess ISW signals.
Contribution
It presents the first measurement of cosmic void lensing in the CMB with DES data, calibrated by simulations, and compares results to N-body simulations to validate the findings.
Findings
Detected void lensing at 3σ significance in DES Y1 data.
Achieved a signal-to-noise ratio of about 4 with optimized strategies.
Found no evidence of excess ISW signal in the Planck CMB lensing map.
Abstract
Cosmic voids gravitationally lens the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation, resulting in a distinct imprint on degree scales. We use the simulated CMB lensing convergence map from the MICE N-body simulation to calibrate our detection strategy for a given void definition and galaxy tracer density. We then identify cosmic voids in DES Year 1 data and stack the Planck 2015 lensing convergence map on their locations, probing the consistency of simulated and observed void lensing signals. When fixing the shape of the stacked convergence profile to that calibrated from simulations, we find imprints at the significance level for various analysis choices. The best measurement strategies based on the MICE calibration process yield for DES Y1, and the best-fit amplitude recovered from the data is consistent with expectations from MICE (). Given these…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
