Gravity, topography, and melt generation rates from simple 3D models of mantle convection
Matthew E. Lees, John F. Rudge, Dan McKenzie

TL;DR
This study uses simple 3D mantle convection models to analyze how flow patterns influence surface observables like gravity, topography, and melt generation, revealing that melt patterns are more sensitive to flow details than gravity or topography.
Contribution
It demonstrates the limited sensitivity of gravity and topography to flow spokes and highlights melt generation as a more responsive observable to mantle flow patterns.
Findings
Gravity and topography mainly reflect mantle plumes.
Melt generation patterns are sensitive to flow features.
Spoke pattern melting occurs with thin lithosphere and high water content.
Abstract
Convection in fluid layers at high Rayleigh number (Ra ) have a spoke pattern planform. Instabilities in the bottom thermal boundary layer develop into hot rising sheets of fluid, with a component of radial flow towards a central upwelling plume. The sheets form the "spokes" of the pattern, and the plumes the "hubs". Such a pattern of flow is expected to occur beneath plate interiors on Earth, but it remains a challenge to use observations to place constraints on the convective planform of the mantle. Here we present predictions of key surface observables (gravity, topography, and rates of melt generation) from simple 3D numerical models of convection in a fluid layer. These models demonstrate that gravity and topography have only limited sensitivity to the spokes, and mostly reflect the hubs (the rising and sinking plumes). By contrast, patterns of melt generation are more…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
