ICU Delirium Prediction Models: A Systematic Review
Matthew M Ruppert (BS) Jessica Lipori (BA), Sandip Patel (MD),, Elizabeth Ingersent, Tezcan Ozrazgat-Baslanti (PhD), Tyler Loftus (MD),, Parisa Rashidi (PhD), Azra Bihorac (MD, MS)

TL;DR
This systematic review analyzes recent ICU delirium prediction models, highlighting their performance, limitations in clinical applicability, and the need for dynamic, real-time prediction tools to improve patient care.
Contribution
The review provides a comprehensive summary of recent prediction models, emphasizing their static nature and the necessity for models that adapt over time for better clinical utility.
Findings
Model AUROC ranged from 0.68 to 0.94
Most models used data from a single time point
Limited models provided actionable predictions
Abstract
Purpose: Summarize ICU delirium prediction models published within the past five years. Methods: Electronic searches were conducted in April 2019 using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and CINAHL to identify peer reviewed studies published in English during the past five years that specifically addressed the development, validation, or recalibration of delirium prediction models in adult ICU populations. Data were extracted using CHARMS checklist elements for systematic reviews of prediction studies, including the following characteristics: study design, participant descriptions and recruitment methods, predicted outcomes, a priori candidate predictors, sample size, model development, model performance, study results, interpretation of those results, and whether the study included missing data. Results: Twenty studies featuring 26 distinct prediction models were…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
