Kolmogorovian versus non-Kolmogorovian probabilities in contextual theories
Claudio Garola

TL;DR
This paper explores how quantum probabilities can be understood as classical averages over microscopic contexts within a Kolmogorovian framework, offering an epistemic interpretation and unifying classical, statistical, and quantum theories.
Contribution
It introduces a class of theories where probabilities are classical averages over contexts, providing an epistemic interpretation for quantum probability within a Kolmogorovian framework.
Findings
Quantum probability can be derived from classical averages over contexts.
The framework unifies classical, statistical, and quantum theories.
Quantum probabilities are non-Kolmogorovian due to contextual averaging.
Abstract
Most scholars maintain that quantum mechanics (QM) is a contextual theory and that quantum probability does not allow an epistemic (ignorance) interpretation. By inquiring possible connections between contextuality and non-classical probabilities we show that a class T of theories can be selected in which probabilities are introduced as classical averages of Kolmogorovian probabilities over sets of (microscopic) contexts, which endows them with an epistemic interpretation. The conditions characterizing T are compatible with classical mechanics (CM), statistical mechanics (SM) and QM, hence we assume that these theories belong to T. In the case of CM and QM this assumption is irrelevant, as all notions introduced in them as members of T reduce to standard notions. In the case of QM it leads to interpret quantum probability as a derived notion in a Kolmogorovian framework, explains why it…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
