Entanglement: Quantum or Classical?
Dilip Paneru, Eliahu Cohen, Robert Fickler, Robert W. Boyd, and, Ebrahim Karimi

TL;DR
This paper explores the fundamental differences between quantum and classical entanglement, reviewing historical context, hidden variables models, and experimental violations of classical bounds to clarify the uniquely quantum nature of entanglement.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of classical explanations for entanglement, discusses inequalities violated by quantum states, and reviews recent advances and future directions in quantum entanglement research.
Findings
Quantum states violate classical inequalities, falsifying hidden variables theories.
Entanglement manifests in phenomena like N00N states and non-separable single particles.
Historical and theoretical analysis clarifies the quantum nature of entanglement.
Abstract
From its seemingly non-intuitive and puzzling nature, most evident in numerous EPR-like gedankenexperiments to its almost ubiquitous presence in quantum technologies, entanglement is at the heart of modern quantum physics. First introduced by Erwin Schr\"{o}dinger nearly a century ago, entanglement has remained one of the most fascinating ideas that came out of quantum mechanics. Here, we attempt to explain what makes entanglement fundamentally different from any classical phenomenon. To this end, we start with a historical overview of entanglement and discuss several hidden variables models that were conceived to provide a classical explanation and demystify quantum entanglement. We discuss some inequalities and bounds that are violated by quantum states thereby falsifying the existence of some of the classical hidden variables theories. We also discuss some exciting manifestations of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
