Multi-Item Mechanisms without Item-Independence: Learnability via Robustness
Johaness Brustle, Yang Cai, Constantinos Daskalakis

TL;DR
This paper investigates the sample complexity of learning revenue-optimal multi-item auctions with correlated bidder valuations modeled by graphical models, introducing a robustness framework that extends learnability results beyond item-independence.
Contribution
It provides the first polynomial-scale sample complexity bounds for learning auctions with correlated valuations using graphical models, and introduces a robustness theorem for approximate distribution learning.
Findings
Polynomial sample complexity bounds for Bayesian Networks and Markov Random Fields.
A robustness theorem enabling learning mechanisms from approximate distributions.
Extension of results to the single-item case with weaker distribution distance.
Abstract
We study the sample complexity of learning revenue-optimal multi-item auctions. We obtain the first set of positive results that go beyond the standard but unrealistic setting of item-independence. In particular, we consider settings where bidders' valuations are drawn from correlated distributions that can be captured by Markov Random Fields or Bayesian Networks -- two of the most prominent graphical models. We establish parametrized sample complexity bounds for learning an up-to- optimal mechanism in both models, which scale polynomially in the size of the model, i.e.~the number of items and bidders, and only exponential in the natural complexity measure of the model, namely either the largest in-degree (for Bayesian Networks) or the size of the largest hyper-edge (for Markov Random Fields). We obtain our learnability results through a novel and modular framework that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
