Role of surface defects and material inhomogeneities for vortex nucleation in superconductors within time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau theory in 2 and 3 dimensions
Alden R. Pack, Jared Carlson, Spencer Wadsworth, and Mark K. Transtrum

TL;DR
This study uses time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau theory to analyze how surface defects and material inhomogeneities influence vortex nucleation and the superheating field in superconductors, with implications for accelerator cavity design.
Contribution
It introduces a finite element simulation approach combined with bifurcation analysis to evaluate the effects of inhomogeneities on vortex nucleation and superheating fields in 2D and 3D geometries.
Findings
Disorder localizes critical modes and reduces superheating fields.
Surface roughness and material variations can nucleate vortices.
3D surface divots can increase superheating fields under certain conditions.
Abstract
We use Time-Dependent Ginzburg-Landau theory to study the nucleation of vortices in type II superconductors in the presence of both geometric and material inhomogeneities. The superconducting Meissner state is meta-stable up to a critical magnetic field, known as the superheating field. For a uniform surface and homogenous material, the superheating transition is driven by a non-local critical mode in which an array of vortices simultaneously penetrate the surface. In contrast, we show that even a small amount of disorder localizes the critical mode and can have a significant reduction in the effective superheating field for a particular sample. Vortices can be nucleated by either surface roughness or local variations in material parameters, such as Tc. Our approach uses a finite element method to simulate a cylindrical geometry in 2 dimensions and a film geometry in 2 and 3 dimensions.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
