Landau-Khalatnikov-Fradkin Transformations, Nielsen Identities, Their Equivalence and Implications for QCD
Tim De Meerleer, David Dudal, Silvio Paolo Sorella, Pietro Dall'Olio,, Adnan Bashir

TL;DR
This paper explores the Landau-Khalatnikov-Fradkin transformations and Nielsen identities in QCD, demonstrating their equivalence and implications for gauge dependence of correlation functions through explicit calculations and theoretical analysis.
Contribution
It derives the LKFTs from first principles in non-Abelian gauge theory and establishes their equivalence with Nielsen identities using BRST symmetry, providing new insights into gauge dependence.
Findings
Explicit one-loop calculation of gluon propagator transformation
Demonstration of equivalence between LKFTs and Nielsen identities
Clarification of gauge dependence in QCD correlation functions
Abstract
The Landau-Khalatnikov-Fradkin transformations (LKFTs) represent an important tool for probing the gauge dependence of the correlation functions within the class of linear covariant gauges. Recently these transformations have been derived from first principles in the context of non-Abelian gauge theory (QCD) introducing a gauge invariant transverse gauge field expressible as an infinite power series in a Stueckelberg field. In this work we explicitly calculate the transformation for the gluon propagator, reproducing its dependence on the gauge parameter at the one loop level and elucidating the role of the extra fields involved in this theoretical framework. Later on, employing a unifying scheme based upon the BRST symmetry and a resulting generalized Slavnov-Taylor identity, we establish the equivalence between the LKFTs and the Nielsen identities which are also known to connect…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
