Lyndon words versus inverse Lyndon words: queries on suffixes and bordered words
Paola Bonizzoni, Clelia De Felice, Rocco Zaccagnino, Rosalba Zizza

TL;DR
This paper explores properties of Lyndon and inverse Lyndon factorizations, establishing bounds on common prefix lengths of suffixes and revealing new relations useful for string comparison tasks.
Contribution
It introduces novel bounds linking suffix common prefixes to inverse Lyndon factorization properties and extends Lyndon word applications in string comparison.
Findings
Maximum common prefix length is bounded by the maximum factor length in inverse Lyndon factorization.
Nonempty borders of factors cannot be prefixes of subsequent factors in inverse Lyndon factorizations.
Lyndon factorizations can capture common overlaps between words.
Abstract
Lyndon words have been largely investigated and showned to be a useful tool to prove interesting combinatorial properties of words. In this paper we state new properties of both Lyndon and inverse Lyndon factorizations of a word , with the aim of exploring their use in some classical queries on . The main property we prove is related to a classical query on words. We prove that there are relations between the length of the longest common extension (or longest common prefix) of two different suffixes of a word and the maximum length of two consecutive factors of the inverse Lyndon factorization of . More precisely, is an upper bound on the length of . This result is in some sense stronger than the compatibility property, proved by Mantaci, Restivo, Rosone and Sciortino for the Lyndon factorization and here for the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
