The thermal-radiative wind in low mass X-ray binary H 1743-322: II. iron line predictions from Monte Carlo radiation transfer
Ryota Tomaru, Chris Done, Ken Ohsuga, Hirokazu Odaka, and Tadayuki, Takahashi

TL;DR
This paper uses Monte Carlo radiation transfer simulations to model thermal-radiative winds in the X-ray binary H1743-322, demonstrating that observed wind features can originate from thermal winds rather than magnetic ones, with velocity structure as a key discriminator.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed Monte Carlo radiation transfer modeling of thermal-radiative winds in a specific black hole binary, challenging the magnetic wind hypothesis for observed features.
Findings
Simulation fits observed line profiles well.
Thermal winds can explain absorption features without magnetic winds.
Velocity structure distinguishes thermal from magnetic winds.
Abstract
We show the best current simulations of the absorption and emission features predicted from thermal-radiative winds produced from X-ray illumination of the outer accretion disc in binary systems. We use the density and velocity structure derived from a radiation hydrodynamic code as input to a Monte-Carlo radiation transport calculation. The initial conditions are matched to those of the black hole binary system H1743-322 in its soft, disc dominated state, where wind features are seen in Chandra grating data. Our simulation fits well to the observed line profile, showing that these physical wind models can be the origin of the absorption features seen, rather than requiring a magnetically driven wind. We show how the velocity structure is the key observable discriminator between magnetic and thermal winds. Magnetic winds are faster at smaller radii, whereas thermal winds transition to a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
