The $\textit{u}$-series: A separable decomposition for electrostatics computation with improved accuracy
Cristian Predescu, Adam K. Lerer, Ross A. Lippert, Brian Towles, J.P., Grossman, Robert M. Dirks, David E. Shaw

TL;DR
The paper introduces the u-series, a new Coulomb potential decomposition that enhances accuracy and reduces computational effort in electrostatics calculations for molecular dynamics, especially in periodic systems.
Contribution
The u-series provides a more accurate and computationally efficient Coulomb decomposition than the standard Ewald method, with potential for further performance gains on parallel supercomputers.
Findings
u-series achieves higher accuracy than Ewald decomposition at the same computational cost.
u-series reduces computational effort by approximately half compared to Ewald for the same accuracy.
Numerical demonstration on lipid membrane system confirms the effectiveness of the u-series.
Abstract
The evaluation of electrostatic energy for a set of point charges in a periodic lattice is a computationally expensive part of molecular dynamics simulations (and other applications) because of the long-range nature of the Coulomb interaction. A standard approach is to decompose the Coulomb potential into a near part, typically evaluated by direct summation up to a cutoff radius, and a far part, typically evaluated in Fourier space. In practice, all decomposition approaches involve approximations---such as cutting off the near-part direct sum---but it may be possible to find new decompositions with improved tradeoffs between accuracy and performance. Here we present the , a new decomposition of the Coulomb potential that is more accurate than the standard (Ewald) decomposition for a given amount of computational effort, and achieves the same accuracy as the Ewald…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
