What's happening in traditional and inquiry-based introductory labs? An integrative analysis at a large research university
Danny Doucette, Russell Clark, and Chandralekha Singh

TL;DR
This study compares traditional and inquiry-based introductory labs at a large research university, using ethnographic observation and surveys to identify strengths and weaknesses for improving lab experiences.
Contribution
It provides an integrative analysis of lab practices and student perceptions, highlighting areas for reform in introductory physics labs.
Findings
Traditional labs have limitations in fostering inquiry skills.
Inquiry-based labs improve student engagement and understanding.
Identifies specific areas for pedagogical improvement.
Abstract
There is a growing recognition of the need to replace "cookbook"-style introductory labs with more-meaningful learning experiences. To identify the strengths and weaknesses of a mix of cookbook-style and inquiry-based labs, an introductory lab course currently being reformed was observed following a reflexive ethnographic protocol and pre and post E-CLASS surveys were administered. We analyzed data to identify shortcomings of the current labs and to determine areas for improvement.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
