A counterexample to the $\phi$-dimension conjecture
Eric J. Hanson, Kiyoshi Igusa

TL;DR
This paper provides a counterexample to the long-standing {} dimension conjecture, challenging previous assumptions and impacting ongoing research in algebraic representation theory.
Contribution
It introduces the first known counterexample to the {} dimension conjecture, revealing limitations of the existing upper bound hypothesis.
Findings
Counterexample disproves the {} dimension conjecture.
Implications suggest the need to revise or refine the conjecture.
Discussion on how this affects the finitistic dimension conjecture.
Abstract
In 2005, the second author and Todorov introduced an upper bound on the finitistic dimension of an Artin algebra, now known as the {\phi}-dimension. The {\phi}-dimension conjecture states that this upper bound is always finite, a fact that would imply the finitistic dimension conjecture. In this paper, we present a counterexample to the {\phi}-dimension conjecture and explain where it comes from. We also discuss implications for further research and the finitistic dimension conjecture.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
