Think-aloud interviews: A tool for exploring student statistical reasoning
Alex Reinhart, Ciaran Evans, Amanda Luby, Josue Orellana, Mikaela, Meyer, Jerzy Wieczorek, Peter Elliott, Philipp Burckhardt, Rebecca Nugent

TL;DR
This paper discusses the use of think-aloud interviews as a valuable research tool in statistics education, highlighting their unique benefits, best practices, and potential applications beyond existing uses.
Contribution
It introduces best-practice guidelines for designing think-aloud studies and explores new potential applications in statistics education research.
Findings
Think-alouds provide detailed insights into student reasoning.
They are effective for validating statistical concept questions.
Guidelines improve the design and utility of think-aloud studies.
Abstract
Think-aloud interviews have been a valuable but underused tool in statistics education research. Think-alouds, in which students narrate their reasoning in real time while solving problems, differ in important ways from other types of cognitive interviews and related education research methods. Beyond the uses already found in the statistics literature -- mostly validating the wording of statistical concept inventory questions and studying student misconceptions -- we suggest other possible use cases for think-alouds and summarize best-practice guidelines for designing think-aloud interview studies. Using examples from our own experiences studying the local student body for our introductory statistics courses, we illustrate how research goals should inform study-design decisions and what kinds of insights think-alouds can provide. We hope that our overview of think-alouds encourages…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
