Overtones or higher harmonics? Prospects for testing the no-hair theorem with gravitational wave detections
Iara Ota, Cecilia Chirenti

TL;DR
This paper assesses the detectability of higher quasinormal modes in black hole ringdowns using simulations, aiming to test the no-hair theorem with gravitational wave data by identifying the most promising modes for detection.
Contribution
The study evaluates the excitation amplitudes of various quasinormal modes, especially the (2,2,1) overtone, to determine their detectability and potential for testing the no-hair theorem in gravitational wave observations.
Findings
The (2,2,1) overtone has a larger excitation amplitude than other higher harmonics for mass ratios 1:1 to 5:1.
The (2,2,1) mode's amplitude ratio to the fundamental mode exceeds 0.65 for equal-mass binaries.
Modes (2,2,1), (2,1,0), and (3,3,0) have comparable amplitudes for mass ratios > 5:1.
Abstract
In light of the current (and future) gravitational wave detections, more sensitive tests of general relativity can be devised. Black hole spectroscopy has long been proposed as a way to test the no-hair theorem, that is, how closely an astrophysical black hole can be described by the Kerr geometry. We use simulations from the Simulating eXtreme Spacetimes project to assess the detectability of one extra quasinormal mode in the ringdown of a binary black hole coalescence, with numbers distinct from the fundamental quadrupolar mode (2,2,0). Our approach uses the complex waveform as well as the time derivative of the phase in two prescriptions that allow us to estimate the point at which the ringdown is best described by a single mode or by a sum of two modes. By scaling all amplitudes to , our results for non-spinning binaries indicate that for mass ratios…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
