A Formal Proof of PAC Learnability for Decision Stumps
Joseph Tassarotti, Koundinya Vajjha, Anindya Banerjee, Jean-Baptiste, Tristan

TL;DR
This paper provides a formal proof in Lean of the PAC learnability of decision stumps, addressing measure-theoretic subtleties and separating deterministic reasoning from probabilistic analysis.
Contribution
It offers the first fully formalized proof of PAC learnability for decision stumps, clarifying measure-theoretic aspects in the process.
Findings
Formal proof of PAC learnability established
Addresses measure-theoretic subtleties in formalization
Separates deterministic and probabilistic reasoning
Abstract
We present a formal proof in Lean of probably approximately correct (PAC) learnability of the concept class of decision stumps. This classic result in machine learning theory derives a bound on error probabilities for a simple type of classifier. Though such a proof appears simple on paper, analytic and measure-theoretic subtleties arise when carrying it out fully formally. Our proof is structured so as to separate reasoning about deterministic properties of a learning function from proofs of measurability and analysis of probabilities.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
