Discovery of s-process enhanced stars in the LAMOST survey
Brodie J Norfolk, Andrew R Casey, Amanda I Karakas, Matthew T Miles,, Alex J Kemp, Kevin C Schlaufman, Melissa Ness, Anna Y Q Ho, John C Lattanzio,, and Alexander P Ji

TL;DR
This paper reports the discovery of 895 s-process-enhanced giant stars from the LAMOST survey, the largest such sample to date, revealing their characteristics, kinematics, and likely origins involving binary mass transfer.
Contribution
It introduces a data-driven method to identify a large sample of s-process-rich stars, expanding the known population and providing insights into their properties and formation scenarios.
Findings
Largest sample of s-process-rich stars discovered to date.
Most stars show strong carbon enhancements, few show sodium.
Majority are disc stars with properties consistent with AGB mass transfer origins.
Abstract
Here we present the discovery of 895 s-process-rich candidates from 454,180 giant stars observed by the Large Sky Area Multi-Object Fibre Spectroscopic Telescope (LAMOST) using a data-driven approach. This sample constitutes the largest number of s-process enhanced stars ever discovered. Our sample includes 187 s-process-rich candidates that are enhanced in both barium and strontium, 49 stars with significant barium enhancement only and 659 stars that show only a strontium enhancement. Most of the stars in our sample are in the range of effective temperature and log g typical of red giant branch (RGB) populations, which is consistent with our observational selection bias towards finding RGB stars. We estimate that only a small fraction (0.5 per cent) of binary configurations are favourable for s-process enriched stars. The majority of our s-process-rich candidates (95 per cent) show…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
