AND Testing and Robust Judgement Aggregation
Yuval Filmus, Noam Lifshitz, Dor Minzer, Elchanan Mossel

TL;DR
This paper characterizes functions that approximately satisfy AND-homomorphism properties, showing they are close to constant or AND functions, with implications for judgment aggregation and social choice theory.
Contribution
It proves that approximate AND-homomorphisms are close to constant or AND functions, improving previous bounds that depended on the number of variables.
Findings
Approximate solutions are close to exact solutions.
Functions close to satisfying the eigenvalue equation are near exact solutions.
Results apply to judgment aggregation, showing closeness to oligarchies.
Abstract
A function is called an approximate AND-homomorphism if choosing randomly, we have that with probability at least , where . We prove that if is an approximate AND-homomorphism, then is -close to either a constant function or an AND function, where as . This improves on a result of Nehama, who proved a similar statement in which depends on . Our theorem implies a strong result on judgement aggregation in computational social choice. In the language of social choice, our result shows that if is -close to satisfying judgement aggregation, then it is -close to an oligarchy (the name for the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
