X-shaped Radio Galaxies: Optical Properties, Large-scale Environment and Relationship to Radio Structure
Ravi Joshi, Gopal-Krishna, Xiaolong Yang, Jingjing Shi, Si-Yue Yu,, Paul J. Wiita, Luis C. Ho, Xue-Bing Wu, Tao An, Ran Wang, Smitha Subramanian, and Hassen Yesuf

TL;DR
This study investigates the optical properties, environment, and radio structure of X-shaped radio galaxies, revealing diverse features and challenging existing models of their origin, with implications for understanding galaxy mergers and black hole characteristics.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of 106 X-shaped radio galaxies, comparing their properties with normal FR II galaxies and questioning the backflow diversion model.
Findings
XRGs have slightly less massive black holes than normal FR II galaxies.
A high fraction (~80%) of XRGs show signs of recent galaxy mergers.
XRGs and FRII galaxies inhabit similarly poor large-scale environments.
Abstract
In order to find clues to the origin of the "winged" or "X-shaped" radio galaxies (XRGs) we investigate here the parent galaxies of a large sample of 106 XRGs for optical-radio axes alignment, interstellar medium, black hole mass, and large-scale environment. For 41 of the XRGs it was possible to determine the optical major axis and the primary radio axis and the strong tendency for the two axes to be fairly close is confirmed. However, several counter-examples were also found and these could challenge the widely discussed backflow diversion model for the origin of the radio wings. Comparison with a well-defined large sample of normal FR II radio galaxies has revealed that: (i) XRGs possess slightly less massive central black holes than the normal radio galaxies (average masses being log 8.81 and 9.07 , respectively); (ii) a much higher fraction…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
