Parity-Violating Inelastic Electron-Proton Scattering at Low $Q^2$ Above the Resonance Region
QWeak Collaboration: D. Androic, D.S. Armstrong, A. Asaturyan, K., Bartlett, R.S. Beminiwattha, J. Benesch, F. Benmokhtar, J. Birchall, R.D., Carlini, J.C. Cornejo, M.M. Dalton, C.A. Davis, W. Deconinck, J.F. Dowd, J.A., Dunne, D. Dutta, W.S. Duvall, W.R. Falk, J.M. Finn, C. Gal

TL;DR
This study measures parity-violating asymmetry in inelastic electron-proton scattering at low $Q^2$ above the resonance region, validating theoretical models of $ ext{γZ}$ interference structure functions relevant for precision electroweak tests.
Contribution
It provides the first experimental measurement of parity-violating asymmetry in this specific inelastic scattering regime, supporting the accuracy of theoretical models used in electroweak physics.
Findings
Measured asymmetry $A_{Inel} = -13.5 ext{ ppm}$ with uncertainties.
Results agree with theoretical calculations of $ ext{γZ}$ interference.
Observed positive asymmetry in inclusive $ ext{π}^-$ production.
Abstract
We report the measurement of the parity-violating asymmetry for the inelastic scattering of electrons from the proton, at GeV and GeV, above the resonance region. The result ~ppm agrees with theoretical calculations, and helps to validate the modeling of the interference structure functions and used in those calculations, which are also used for determination of the two-boson exchange box diagram () contribution to parity-violating elastic scattering measurements. A positive parity-violating asymmetry for inclusive production was observed, as well as positive beam-normal single-spin asymmetry for scattered electrons and a negative beam-normal single-spin asymmetry for inclusive production.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
