One-point probability distribution function from spherical collapse: Early Dark Energy (EDE) vs. $\Lambda$CDM
Ankush Mandal, Sharvari Nadkarni-Ghosh

TL;DR
This paper computes the one-point PDF of dark matter density fields using spherical collapse, compares models with Early Dark Energy and $ ext{Lambda}$CDM, and assesses the impact of cosmology on non-linear growth and PDF fitting accuracy.
Contribution
It introduces a spherical collapse-based method for the one-point PDF and compares cosmological effects in EDE and $ ext{Lambda}$CDM$, validating a density-velocity relation fit for EDE.
Findings
Skewed log-normal fits the non-linear PDF well for both cosmologies.
Differences in non-linear growth depend on initial conditions and are model-dependent.
The density-velocity divergence relation fit remains accurate for EDE within 4 ext%.
Abstract
We compute the one-point PDF of an initially Gaussian dark matter density field using spherical collapse (SC). We compare the results to other forms available in the literature and also compare the PDFs in the CDM model with an early dark energy (EDE) model. We find that the skewed log-normal distribution provides the best fit to the non-linear PDF from SC for both cosmologies, from to 1 and for scales characterized by the comoving width of the Gaussian: . To elucidate the effect of cosmology, we examine the linear and non-linear growth rates through test cases. For overdensities, when the two models have the same initial density contrast, the differences due to cosmology are amplified in the non-linear regime, whereas, if the two models have the same linear density contrast today, then the differences in cosmology are damped in the non-linear…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
