Approximately Stable Committee Selection
Zhihao Jiang, Kamesh Munagala, Kangning Wang

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new stability concept for committee selection with weighted candidates and monotonic preferences, proving that a constant-factor approximate stability always exists.
Contribution
It defines $c$-approximate stability in committee selection and proves the existence of such stable committees with a constant factor for all monotone preferences.
Findings
Existence of $c$-approximate stable committees with constant $c$ for all monotone preferences.
Extension of classical core stability to approximate stability with provable bounds.
Use of randomized methods and iterative rounding in the proof.
Abstract
In the committee selection problem, we are given candidates, and voters. Candidates can have different weights. A committee is a subset of candidates, and its weight is the sum of weights of its candidates. Each voter expresses an ordinal ranking over all possible committees. The only assumption we make on preferences is monotonicity: If are two committees, then any voter weakly prefers to . We study a general notion of group fairness via stability: A committee of given total weight is stable if no coalition of voters can deviate and choose a committee of proportional weight, so that all these voters strictly prefer the new committee to the existing one. Extending this notion to approximation, for parameter , a committee of weight is said to be -approximately stable if for any other committee of weight , the fraction of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Auction Theory and Applications
