Longitudinal short-distance constraints for the hadronic light-by-light contribution to $(g-2)_\mu$ with large-$N_c$ Regge models
Gilberto Colangelo, Franziska Hagelstein, Martin Hoferichter, Laetitia, Laub, Peter Stoffer

TL;DR
This paper develops a model incorporating large-N_c Regge theory and short-distance QCD constraints to refine the hadronic light-by-light contribution to the muon's anomalous magnetic moment, reducing uncertainties in the calculation.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach combining Regge models, operator product expansion, and perturbative QCD to better estimate the pseudoscalar-pole contributions to HLbL scattering.
Findings
Longitudinal SDCs increase the HLbL contribution by approximately 13×10^{-11}
The approach constrains excited pseudoscalar states using Regge theory and phenomenology
The charm quark contribution to HLbL is estimated at 3×10^{-11}
Abstract
While the low-energy part of the hadronic light-by-light (HLbL) tensor can be constrained from data using dispersion relations, for a full evaluation of its contribution to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon also mixed- and high-energy regions need to be estimated. Both can be addressed within the operator product expansion (OPE), either for configurations where all photon virtualities become large or one of them remains finite. Imposing such short-distance constraints (SDCs) on the HLbL tensor is thus a major aspect of a model-independent approach towards HLbL scattering. Here, we focus on longitudinal SDCs, which concern the amplitudes containing the pseudoscalar-pole contributions from , , . Since these conditions cannot be fulfilled by a finite number of pseudoscalar poles, we consider a tower of excited pseudoscalars, constraining their masses…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
