Milky Way Analogues in MaNGA: Multi-Parameter Homogeneity and Comparison to the Milky Way
Nicholas Fraser Boardman, Gail Zasowski, Anil Seth, Jeff Newman, Brett, Andrews, Matt Bershady, Jonathan Bird, Cristina Chiappini, Catherine Fielder,, Amelia Fraser-McKelvie, Amy Jones, Tim Licquia, Karen Masters, Ivan Minchev,, Ricardo Schiavon, Joel Brownstein, Niv Drory

TL;DR
This study analyzes Milky Way analogs from the MaNGA survey, examining their stellar populations, kinematics, and metallicity gradients to compare their properties with those of the Milky Way, revealing insights into galaxy evolution.
Contribution
The paper introduces a sample of Milky Way analogs from MaNGA and compares their properties to the Milky Way, highlighting the importance of scale and perspective in galaxy characterization.
Findings
Milky Way analogs show diverse central stellar ages.
Metallicity gradients are flatter in physical units but align better when scaled by disc length.
Differences in metallicity gradients are partly due to galaxy compactness and observational perspective.
Abstract
The Milky Way provides an ideal laboratory to test our understanding of galaxy evolution, owing to our ability to observe our Galaxy over fine scales. However, connecting the Galaxy to the wider galaxy population remains difficult, due to the challenges posed by our internal perspective and to the different observational techniques employed. Here, we present a sample of galaxies identified as Milky Way Analogs (MWAs) on the basis of their stellar masses and bulge-to-total ratios, observed as part of the Mapping Nearby Galaxies at Apache Point Observatory (MaNGA) survey. We analyse the galaxies in terms of their stellar kinematics and populations as well as their ionised gas contents. We find our sample to contain generally young stellar populations in their outskirts. However, we find a wide range of stellar ages in their central regions, and we detect central AGN-like or composite-like…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
