TL;DR
This paper empirically compares various session-based recommendation algorithms, including neural and heuristic methods, revealing that simple heuristics often outperform complex neural approaches in accuracy and user acceptance.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive empirical comparison of twelve algorithms, including neural methods, on multiple datasets, and shares an evaluation framework for future research.
Findings
Neural methods show limited improvement over simple heuristics.
Heuristic nearest-neighbor methods often outperform neural approaches.
User study indicates heuristic recommendations are well accepted.
Abstract
Recommender systems are tools that support online users by pointing them to potential items of interest in situations of information overload. In recent years, the class of session-based recommendation algorithms received more attention in the research literature. These algorithms base their recommendations solely on the observed interactions with the user in an ongoing session and do not require the existence of long-term preference profiles. Most recently, a number of deep learning based ("neural") approaches to session-based recommendations were proposed. However, previous research indicates that today's complex neural recommendation methods are not always better than comparably simple algorithms in terms of prediction accuracy. With this work, our goal is to shed light on the state-of-the-art in the area of session-based recommendation and on the progress that is made with neural…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
