On positionality of trigger strategies Nash Equilibria in SCAR
George Konstantinidis, Athanasios Kehagias

TL;DR
This paper investigates the positionality of trigger strategies Nash equilibria in N-player SCAR games, revealing that most are nonpositional and highlighting the influence of graph paths and parameters like epsilon and gamma.
Contribution
Introduces the concept of the state cop number and provides an exhaustive analysis of when trigger strategies are positional in SCAR games.
Findings
Most trigger strategy Nash equilibria are nonpositional.
Paths and parameters epsilon, gamma influence positionality.
The state cop number is a key analytical tool.
Abstract
We study the positionality of \emph{trigger strategies} Nash equilibria for the -player SCAR games (with ). Our study is exhaustive with respect to types of graphs , initial states and values of . We conclude that in the majority of cases, profiles are nonpositional. Whenever are positional a key role is played by paths and the , values (especially whether or not). A crucial concept in our analysis is the \emph{state cop number}, which is first introduced in the current paper.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
