Effect of electron doping in FeTe$_{1-y}$Se$_{y}$ realized by Co and Ni substitution
M. Rosmus, R. Kurleto, D. J. Gawryluk, J. Goraus, M. Z. Cieplak, and, P. Starowicz

TL;DR
This study uses ARPES to investigate how Co and Ni doping affect the electronic structure of FeTe$_{1-y}$Se$_{y}$, revealing Lifshitz transitions, Fermi surface changes, and deviations from rigid band behavior, impacting superconductivity.
Contribution
It provides detailed experimental insights into how electron doping via Co and Ni alters the band structure and Fermi surface topology in FeTe$_{1-y}$Se$_{y}$, highlighting deviations from simple models.
Findings
Doping causes Lifshitz transitions and Fermi surface modifications.
Charge transfer efficiency differs between Co and Ni doping.
Doping reduces the nesting condition and critical temperature.
Abstract
Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) reveals effects of electron doping, which is realized by Co and Ni substitution for Fe in FeTeSe (y0.35) superconductor. The data show consistent band shifts as well as expansion and shrinking of electron and hole Fermi surface, respectively. Doping of either element leads to a Lifshitz transition realized as a removal of one or two hole pockets. This explains qualitatively a complex behavior of Hall coefficient observed before [Bezusyy, et al., Phys. Rev. B 91, 100502 (2015)], including change of sign with doping, which takes place only below room temperature. Assuming that Ni substitution should deliver twice more electrons to the valence band than Co, it appears that such transfer is slightly more effective in the case of Co. Therefore, charge doping cannot account for much stronger effect of Ni on superconducting…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
