Unraveling the Effect of Spatial Resolution and Scan Acceleration on 3D Image-Based Navigators for Respiratory Motion Tracking in Coronary MR Angiography

TL;DR

This study evaluates how spatial resolution and scan acceleration affect the accuracy of 3D image-based navigators for respiratory motion tracking in coronary MR angiography, finding that 6.4 mm resolution offers optimal performance.

Contribution

The paper introduces an optimized undersampled 3D iNAV configuration at 6.4 mm resolution that improves motion tracking accuracy over previous 4.4 mm methods.

Findings

6.4 mm iNAV provides the best balance of resolution and acceleration.

Higher acceleration factors lead to decreased motion estimate accuracy.

Using 6.4 mm iNAV improves coronary vessel sharpness in practice.

Abstract

Purpose: To study the accuracy of motion information extracted from beat-to-beat 3D image-based navigators (3D iNAVs) collected using a variable-density cones trajectory with different combinations of spatial resolutions and scan acceleration factors. Methods: Fully sampled, breath-held 4.4 mm 3D iNAV datasets for six respiratory phases are acquired in a volunteer. Ground truth translational and nonrigid motion information is derived from these datasets. Subsequently, the motion estimates from synthesized undersampled 3D iNAVs with isotropic spatial resolutions of 4.4 mm (acceleration factor = 10.9), 5.4 mm (acceleration factor = 7.2), 6.4 mm (acceleration factor = 4.2), and 7.8 mm (acceleration factor = 2.9) are assessed against the ground truth information. The undersampled 3D iNAV configuration with the highest accuracy motion estimates in simulation is then compared with the originally proposed 4.4 mm undersampled 3D iNAV in six volunteer studies. Results: The simulations indicate that for navigators beyond certain scan acceleration factors, the accuracy of motion estimates is compromised due to errors from residual aliasing and blurring/smoothening effects following compressed sensing reconstruction. The 6.4 mm 3D iNAV achieves an acceptable spatial resolution with a small acceleration factor, resulting in the highest accuracy motion information among all assessed undersampled 3D iNAVs. Reader scores for six volunteer studies demonstrate superior coronary vessel sharpness when applying an autofocusing nonrigid correction technique using the 6.4 mm 3D iNAVs in place of 4.4 mm 3D iNAVs. Conclusion: Undersampled 6.4 mm 3D iNAVs enable motion tracking with improved accuracy relative to previously proposed undersampled 4.4 mm 3D iNAVs.