TL;DR
This paper investigates mode collapse in GANs by visualizing omitted object classes and analyzing specific failure cases, providing insights into what GANs fail to generate.
Contribution
It introduces a method to visualize and quantify mode collapse at both distribution and instance levels, revealing common failure modes of recent GANs.
Findings
Identified object classes frequently omitted by GANs.
Visualized specific instances where GANs fail to generate accurate images.
Analyzed multiple datasets and GAN architectures to find common failure patterns.
Abstract
Despite the success of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), mode collapse remains a serious issue during GAN training. To date, little work has focused on understanding and quantifying which modes have been dropped by a model. In this work, we visualize mode collapse at both the distribution level and the instance level. First, we deploy a semantic segmentation network to compare the distribution of segmented objects in the generated images with the target distribution in the training set. Differences in statistics reveal object classes that are omitted by a GAN. Second, given the identified omitted object classes, we visualize the GAN's omissions directly. In particular, we compare specific differences between individual photos and their approximate inversions by a GAN. To this end, we relax the problem of inversion and solve the tractable problem of inverting a GAN layer instead of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsConvolution · Dogecoin Customer Service Number +1-833-534-1729
