The nature of the broadband X-ray variability in the dwarf Seyfert galaxy NGC 4395

TL;DR

This study analyzes the X-ray variability of the dwarf Seyfert galaxy NGC 4395, revealing complex absorption structures, flux-ionization correlations, and implications for the broad line region's inhomogeneity, with future prospects using upcoming X-ray missions.

Contribution

It provides the first flux-resolved spectral analysis of NGC 4395 with detailed absorber modeling and discusses the variability mechanisms and future observational strategies.

Findings

Positive correlation between flux and ionization parameter.

Variable neutral absorber covering fraction explains soft X-ray variability.

Differences in power spectral timescales across energies and observations.

Abstract

We present a flux-resolved X-ray analysis of the dwarf Seyfert 1.8 galaxy NGC 4395, based on three archival $XMM-Newton$ and one archival $NuSTAR$ observations. The source is known to harbor a low mass black hole ($\sim 10^4- {\rm a~ few~}\times 10^{5}~\rm M_\odot$) and shows strong variability in the full X-ray range during these observations. We model the flux-resolved spectra of the source assuming three absorbing layers: neutral, mildly ionized, and highly ionized ($N_{\rm H} \sim 1.6\times 10^{22}-3.4 \times 10^{23}~\rm cm^{-2}$, $\sim 0.8-7.8 \times 10^{22}~\rm cm^{-2}$, and $ 3.8 \times 10^{22}~\rm cm^{-2}$, respectively. The source also shows intrinsic variability by a factor of $\sim 3$, on short timescales, due to changes in the nuclear flux, assumed to be a power law ($\Gamma = 1.6-1.67$). Our results show a positive correlation between the intrinsic flux and the absorbers' ionization parameter. The covering fraction of the neutral absorber varies during the first $XMM-Newton$ observation, which could explain the pronounced soft X-ray variability. However, the source remains fully covered by this layer during the other two observations, largely suppressing the soft X-ray variability. This suggests an inhomogeneous and layered structure in the broad line region. We also find a difference in the characteristic timescale of the power spectra between different energy ranges and observations. We finally show simulated spectra with $XRISM$, $Athena$, and $eXTP$, which will allow us to characterize the different absorbers, study their dynamics, and will help us identify their locations and sizes.