Strict experimental test of macroscopic realism in a light-matter-interfaced system
Xiao Liu, Zong-Quan Zhou, Yong-Jian Han, Zong-Feng Li, Jun Hu,, Tian-Shu Yang, Pei-Yun Li, Chao Liu, Xue Li, Yu Ma, Peng-Jun Liang,, Chuan-Feng Li, and Guang-Can Guo

TL;DR
This study implements a strict test of macroscopic realism using a light-matter system, creating large-scale entanglement to challenge classical views and demonstrate quantum superpositions at macroscopic levels.
Contribution
It introduces a new protocol to test macroscopic realism with solid-state components, creating large superposition states involving up to 76 atomic excitations.
Findings
Ruled out theories denying superpositions of large atomic ensembles.
Demonstrated entanglement between macroscopically distinguishable solid-state systems.
Extended the size of superposition states achievable in atomic systems.
Abstract
Macroscopic realism is a classical worldview that a macroscopic system is always determinately in one of the two or more macroscopically distinguishable states available to it, and so is never in a superposition of these states. The question of whether there is a fundamental limitation on the possibility to observe quantum phenomena at the macroscopic scale remains unclear. Here we implement a strict and simple protocol to test macroscopic realism in a light-matter interfaced system. We create a micro-macro entanglement with two macroscopically distinguishable solid-state components and rule out those theories which would deny coherent superpositions of up to 76 atomic excitations shared by 10^10 ions in two separated solids. These results provide a general method to enhance the size of superposition states of atoms by utilizing quantum memory techniques and to push the envelope of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
