Reality or Mirage? Observational Test and Implications for the Claimed Extremely Magnified Quasar at $z = 6.3$
Fabio Pacucci, Abraham Loeb

TL;DR
This paper tests the claim that a high-redshift quasar is strongly lensed, finding that such a lensing scenario requires an unusually steep luminosity function and has significant implications for understanding early black hole growth.
Contribution
It provides a consistency check on the lensing claim for a $z=6.3$ quasar, challenging previous assumptions and emphasizing the need for further multi-wavelength searches for lensed quasars.
Findings
Commonly used luminosity function slopes are inconsistent with the lensing claim.
If the lensing claim is true, most $z>6$ quasars are likely magnified.
A small percentage of lensed quasars can significantly alter the intrinsic luminosity function.
Abstract
In the last two decades, approximately 200 quasars have been discovered at , hosting active super-massive black holes with masses . While these sources reflect only the tip of the iceberg of the black hole mass distribution, their detection challenges standard growth models. The most massive black hole that was inferred thus far (J0100+2802, ) was recently claimed to be lensed, with a magnification factor . Here, we perform a consistency check of this claim, finding that the detection of such source requires a bright-end slope for the intrinsic quasar luminosity function, . Commonly used values of are rejected at . If the claim is confirmed, it is very unlikely that all the remaining sources in the SDSS…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
