Findings of the NLP4IF-2019 Shared Task on Fine-Grained Propaganda Detection
Giovanni Da San Martino, Alberto Barr\'on-Cede\~no, Preslav Nakov

TL;DR
This paper reports on the NLP4IF-2019 shared task focused on detecting propaganda in news articles, involving fragment-level and sentence-level classification tasks, with multiple teams achieving significant improvements over baselines.
Contribution
It introduces a shared task on fine-grained propaganda detection, providing datasets, benchmarks, and a competitive platform for system development.
Findings
Most systems outperformed baselines significantly
12 teams participated in fragment-level task
25 teams participated in sentence-level task
Abstract
We present the shared task on Fine-Grained Propaganda Detection, which was organized as part of the NLP4IF workshop at EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019. There were two subtasks. FLC is a fragment-level task that asks for the identification of propagandist text fragments in a news article and also for the prediction of the specific propaganda technique used in each such fragment (18-way classification task). SLC is a sentence-level binary classification task asking to detect the sentences that contain propaganda. A total of 12 teams submitted systems for the FLC task, 25 teams did so for the SLC task, and 14 teams eventually submitted a system description paper. For both subtasks, most systems managed to beat the baseline by a sizable margin. The leaderboard and the data from the competition are available at http://propaganda.qcri.org/nlp4if-shared-task/.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNatural Language Processing Techniques · Topic Modeling · Misinformation and Its Impacts
