Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Psychiatry: Qualitative Findings from a Global Physician Survey
Charlotte Blease, Cosima Locher, Marisa Leon-Carlyle, P. Murali, Doraiswamy

TL;DR
This study surveyed psychiatrists worldwide to understand their opinions on AI's potential to transform psychiatric practice, highlighting skepticism about full replacement of human empathy and mixed views on collaboration benefits.
Contribution
It provides qualitative insights into psychiatrists' perspectives on AI's impact, emphasizing ethical, practical, and professional considerations in a global context.
Findings
Psychiatrists doubt AI can fully replace human empathy.
Many see AI as a tool for improving efficiency and access.
Opinions on AI's benefits and harms are mixed.
Abstract
The potential for machine learning to disrupt the medical profession is the subject of ongoing debate within biomedical informatics. This study aimed to explore psychiatrists' opinions about the potential impact of innovations in artificial intelligence and machine learning on psychiatric practice. In Spring 2019, we conducted a web-based survey of 791 psychiatrists from 22 countries worldwide. The survey measured opinions about the likelihood future technology would fully replace physicians in performing ten key psychiatric tasks. This study involved qualitative descriptive analysis of written response to three open-ended questions in the survey. Comments were classified into four major categories in relation to the impact of future technology on patient-psychiatric interactions, the quality of patient medical care, the profession of psychiatry, and health systems. Overwhelmingly,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
